Archives - January 2004archives -- index by author -- index by category -- favorite books -- links |
6 January 2004
Books read: 4
10 January 2004
Books read: 8
15 January 2004
Books read: 8
19 January 2004
Books read: 5
22 January 2004
Books read: 6
25 January 2004
Books read: 2
26 January 2004
Books read: 1
28 January 2004
The reason NASA gave for not admitting women to the program was that they only wanted test pilots (more specifically, military test pilots for Mercury; for later groups, civilians were also accepted), and at the time, the military did not allow women to be test pilots. I think most people would agree that this was notably unfair and sexist on the part of the military. However, what I wanted to know was what the actual differences were between the experience of test pilots and other pilots and therefore whether, for NASA, it was reasonable to require that astronauts be test pilots. Clearly, the women were physically and psychologically just as qualified as the men, but did their lack of test pilot experience (and in most cases, lack of college degrees and experience flying jets) actually make a difference?
Unfortunately, the book totally failed to satisfy me on this count. The
physical and psychological testing was gone into in great (and interesting)
detail, but there was no examination of any other qualifications, so I
didn't feel that it presented a very balanced picture.
Books read: 5
31 January 2004
Books read: 6
Total books read this month: 45
Total books read this year: 45
|
|
|
Last updated 29 November 2005. |